Last Updated 4th March 2013
Every now and again the debate rages on the gear forums, what lens is
best, a zoom or a prime. The usual clichés pop up - "I can zoom with
my feet", "a prime has better image quality", "a prime has
better colours", "you'll get more pictures with a zoom" amongst many
others - I should know, I have used them myself.
It is relatively simple to break it down and determine some
logical positives -
Autofocus/Manual Focus -
Single Zoom Lens
-
Less expensive than several prime lenses within the zooms focal
range
-
Lighter in the bag than several prime lenses
within the zooms focal range
-
Able to put the maximum number of sensor pixels into the image by
zooming when the photographer who has a short prime, is
unable to walk into the scene
and is forced to crop the scene in post processing
-
Ideal for capturing a subject that is fast moving and continually
changing the frame perspective
Autofocus/Manual Focus - Single Prime Lens
-
Ideal for maximum resolution at a given focal length
-
It can
have
a wider maximum aperture than a zoom lens, even as wide as f0.95
whilst a 'professional' zoom is usually a f2.8 maximum wide aperture
throughout the zoom focal length
-
Has a
depth of field scale on the lens
barrel for
zone and
hyperfocal
focusing
It all depends on the type of photography you like, some claim that you
are not a photographer unless you shoot everything, so they go out and
shoot large numbers of images across the photographic spectrum.
Others have developed a niche subject in their photography and have
concentrated on that subject (e.g. sport, wildlife, portraits,
landscapes, macro, architecture, street, etc) achieving great
personal satisfaction in their work and also a wider recognition of
their skills. They have carefully analysed the type of camera and lens
(or lenses) required, worked hard to hone the equipment's
handling to 'optimise' their photographic skill and to deliver the style
of images they are seeking!
Lenses, whether a prime or a zoom have their own signature, their own
draw, individual depths of colour and whether they are sharp or soft to
suit your style of work. When you read reviews on a lens, you can often
be misled as many reviewers do not cover the image capability of the
lens in complex scene scenarios. For example, a prime lens may have soft
borders and very gradual vignetting when opened up wide (f0.95 to f2)
and
it's image capturing capability may appear negative to one photographer
but to another it is very positive; it brings an atmosphere to their
images especially as the lens centre is often razor sharp at those
apertures and draws the primary subject out from the background as if
bathed in light. It is ironic that many photographers invest in
expensive software to emulate that very atmosphere.
This image was captured
using a 'consumer priced'
(£129.00) Sony DT 35mm f1.8 SAM prime
lens which does not produce
gradual vignetting at a f2
aperture - so software was
used to emulate it -
Financial budgets will always have a say in determining the camera and
lens or lenses that a photographer uses for his or her work. However, as
is often the case it pays to research lenses very carefully and if for serious niche photography, they are probably best rented for
trial before purchasing!
If you have enjoyed this article - please donate to my
Charity of Choice - The Sick Kids
Richard Lawrence
Scotland
United Kingdom
Back to Articles Page
|